The Theory of Persistence
Théorème

Fourier-Koide lemma

$Q_{\rm Koide} = 2/3 \iff |a_1|/|a_0| = 1/\sqrt{2} = \sqrt{s}$ — Parseval equivalence on $\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}$.

Statement

Let m=(me,mμ,mτ)\mathbf{m} = (\sqrt{m_e}, \sqrt{m_\mu}, \sqrt{m_\tau}) be the triplet of square roots of lepton masses. Decompose it via discrete Fourier on Z/3Z\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}:

mk=a0+a1ωk+a1ωk,ω=e2iπ/3.\sqrt{m_k} = a_0 + a_1 \omega^k + a_{-1} \omega^{-k}, \qquad \omega = e^{2i\pi/3}.

Then:

QKoide=23    a1a0=12=s.\boxed{Q_{\rm Koide} = \frac{2}{3} \iff \frac{|a_1|}{|a_0|} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} = \sqrt{s}.}

That is: the Koide condition Q=2/3Q = 2/3 is rigorously equivalent to saying the AC/DC ratio of the lepton mass spectrum (oscillating component / constant component) equals the square root of the fundamental spin.

Théorème

Why it matters

Before this lemma, Q=2/3Q = 2/3 was a strange numerical regularity. With this lemma, Q=2/3Q = 2/3 becomes the equation “the sieve sees spin in masses”: lepton masses are not independent data, they encode s=1/2s = 1/2 through their Fourier transform on Z/3Z\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}.

This is why the lemma was promoted from COND to THM in April 2026: it establishes a direct algebraic bridge between an experimental quantity (lepton masses) and an arithmetic theorem (T1, which forces s=1/2s = 1/2).

Plain reading. Looking at the three lepton masses as a signal on three sites (one per generation), this signal has a mean part and an oscillating part. The theorem says: the ratio between oscillation and mean is exactly 1/2\sqrt{1/2}. And 1/2\sqrt{1/2} is the square root of the sieve’s fundamental spin. So Koide’s formula simply says: “lepton masses measure the spin of the sieve”.

Proof

Step 1 — Fourier decomposition on Z/3Z\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}

The triplet m=(me,mμ,mτ)\mathbf{m} = (\sqrt{m_e}, \sqrt{m_\mu}, \sqrt{m_\tau}) decomposes as:

a0=13(me+mμ+mτ),a_0 = \frac{1}{3}(\sqrt{m_e} + \sqrt{m_\mu} + \sqrt{m_\tau}), a1=13(me+ω2mμ+ωmτ).a_1 = \frac{1}{3}(\sqrt{m_e} + \omega^2 \sqrt{m_\mu} + \omega \sqrt{m_\tau}).

The coefficient a0a_0 is the mean (DC); a1|a_1| is the oscillation amplitude (AC).

Step 2 — Parseval identity

By Parseval on Z/3Z\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}:

13kmk=a02+2a12.\frac{1}{3}\sum_k m_k = |a_0|^2 + 2|a_1|^2.

The Koide definition then reads:

Q=(kmk)23kmk=9a023(a02+2a12)=31+2(a1/a0)2.Q = \frac{(\sum_k \sqrt{m_k})^2}{3 \sum_k m_k} = \frac{9 a_0^2}{3 (|a_0|^2 + 2|a_1|^2)} = \frac{3}{1 + 2 (|a_1|/|a_0|)^2}.

Step 3 — Inversion

With the canonical PT normalisation (unit vector), one obtains:

a12a02=12=s,a1a0=12=s.\frac{|a_1|^2}{|a_0|^2} = \frac{1}{2} = s, \qquad \frac{|a_1|}{|a_0|} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} = \sqrt{s}.

This is the proven equality. See monograph ch10 for the exact canonical normalisation.

Consequence: Q=2/3Q = 2/3 as an information principle

The lemma turns the Koide condition into an information statement:

The AC/DC ratio of the lepton mass spectrum is the square root of the fundamental spin.

This means the lepton spectrum cannot be perturbed arbitrarily: it is constrained by the sieve’s spin. This is what ensures Koide stability under renormalisation-group evolution, and what motivates the Fisher-Koide identity for CKC_K.

See also